In the matter of Trico Constructions Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1831

In the matter of Trico Constructions Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1831

Trico established a genuinely arguable offsetting claim regarding the inclusion of commissioning within 'Trade Works' and entitlement to liquidated damages for late completion. There were competing, arguable constructions of the contract, and summary determination was not appropriate. As the substantiated amount would be reduced below the statutory minimum, the demand must be set aside.

Parties
Plaintiff: Trico Constructions Pty Ltd; Defendant: Autolift Garage Doors Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's application allowed; statutory demand set aside; Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs.
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Offsetting Claim, Winding Up, Liquidated Damages, Construction Contracts
Corporations Law Contract Law Statutory Demand Offsetting Claim Winding Up Liquidated Damages Construction Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Trico Constructions Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Autolift Garage Doors Pty Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff has a genuine offsetting claim under s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to set aside a statutory demand
  2. 2 Competing constructions of contractual obligations relating to completion of works and entitlement to liquidated damages
  3. 3 Whether the prevention principle operates to bar the Plaintiff's claim for liquidated damages

Ratio Decidendi

Trico established a genuinely arguable offsetting claim regarding the inclusion of commissioning within 'Trade Works' and entitlement to liquidated damages for late completion. There were competing, arguable constructions of the contract, and summary determination was not appropriate. As the substantiated amount would be reduced below the statutory minimum, the demand must be set aside.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application allowed; statutory demand set aside; Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs.

Orders

  • The creditor's statutory demand dated 14 July 2017 issued by the Defendant be set aside.
  • Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, as agreed or as assessed.