Trinco (NSW) Pty Ltd v Alpha A Group Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 239
The adjudication determination was void because the payment claim in question sought payment for work done under two different contracts, and neither contract provided an available reference date to support the claim, thus failing the basic requirements for adjudication jurisdiction under the Security of Payment Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Adjudication determination declared void and quashed.
- Legal Topics
- ['security of Payment' 'adjudication' 'jurisdiction' 'reference Dates' 'termination of Contract']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether adjudication determination was valid under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)' 'Whether a payment claim comprising work under two construction contracts is valid' 'Whether reference dates exist after termination of contract']
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudication determination was void because the payment claim in question sought payment for work done under two different contracts, and neither contract provided an available reference date to support the claim, thus failing the basic requirements for adjudication jurisdiction under the Security of Payment Act.
Court Disposition
Adjudication determination declared void and quashed.
Orders
- ['Declare that the adjudication determination made by the second defendant on 6 November 2017, on application 2017ADJT501, is void.' 'Order that the said determination be quashed.' 'Order that the money paid into court by the plaintiff and any interest thereon be paid out to it or, at its direction, to its...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment