Tronox Limited, in the matter of Tronox Limited [2019] FCA 312
The Court made orders convening the Scheme Meetings because Tronox was a Part 5.1 body proposing arrangements with its members; ASIC had received the required notice and reasonable opportunity to examine the Schemes and explanatory statement; the proposed Schemes were conventional redomiciliation schemes and not facially unfair or inappropriate; shareholders would receive adequate disclosure through the Information Memorandum and Independent Expert's report; Exxaro was properly treated as a separate class; the Connecticut meeting location was appropriate given the shareholder base; and specific DTC voting directions were justified to avoid disenfranchising the vast majority of Class A...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Convene Meetings to Consider Proposed Schemes of Arrangement / First Court Hearing; Orders Made Convening Scheme Meetings and Approving the Explanatory Statement
- Outcome
- Orders made under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) convening meetings of Class A Shareholders and the Class B Shareholder and approving the Information Memorandum, with further hearing adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- ['redomiciliation From Australia to the United Kingdom' 'convening Scheme Meetings' 'shareholder Classes' 'depository Trust Company Voting System' 'explanatory Statement Approval' 'united States Securities Law Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Convene Meetings to Consider Proposed Schemes of Arrangement / First Court Hearing; Orders Made Convening Scheme Meetings and Approving the Explanatory Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should order under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that meetings of Tronox shareholders be convened to consider the proposed schemes of arrangement.' 'Whether Class A Shareholders and the Class B Shareholder should vote in separate classes.' 'Whether the proposed Scheme Meetings could appropriately be held in Stamford, Connecticut.' 'Whether voting procedures should accommodate the Depository Trust Company system in the United States.' 'Whether the Schemes were fit for consideration by shareholders and the Information Memorandum provided adequate disclosure.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court made orders convening the Scheme Meetings because Tronox was a Part 5.1 body proposing arrangements with its members; ASIC had received the required notice and reasonable opportunity to examine the Schemes and explanatory statement; the proposed Schemes were conventional redomiciliation schemes and not facially unfair or inappropriate; shareholders would receive adequate disclosure through the Information Memorandum and Independent Expert's report; Exxaro was properly treated as a separate class; the Connecticut meeting location was appropriate given the shareholder base; and specific DTC voting directions were justified to avoid disenfranchising the vast majority of Class A...
Court Disposition
Orders made under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) convening meetings of Class A Shareholders and the Class B Shareholder and approving the Information Memorandum, with further hearing adjourned.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to subsection 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Tronox convene and hold a Class A Meeting and a Class B Meeting at Stamford Marriott Hotel, Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America to consider and, if thought fit, approve the Schemes.' 'The Scheme Meetings be convened by sending the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment