TROULIS and ANOR v VAMVOUKAKIS and ANOR [1998] NSWCA 236
The appellants were permitted to amend their notice of appeal to include the damages issue. Each party was to bear their own costs at first instance, and respondents were to pay half of the appellants' costs on appeal and cross-appeal, reflecting the mixed success and multiplicity of issues.
- Parties
- Appellant: Troulis; Respondent: Vamvoukakis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Conversion, Damages, Fair Trading Act, Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Troulis
Appellant
Vamvoukakis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 entitlement to damages for conversion
- 2 validity of claim under the Fair Trading Act
- 3 allocation of costs at trial and on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants were permitted to amend their notice of appeal to include the damages issue. Each party was to bear their own costs at first instance, and respondents were to pay half of the appellants' costs on appeal and cross-appeal, reflecting the mixed success and multiplicity of issues.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appellants to amend notice of appeal to raise damages point.
- Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment