Troy M Pascoe-Webbe and Projectworx P/L v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 285
Notwithstanding minor non-compliance with development standards, the proposal meets the objectives of the planning controls as interpreted and found not to constitute overdevelopment, adversely affect neighbourhood character, or amenity, and the SEPP 1 objection was accepted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Hearing and Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'overdevelopment' 'neighbourhood Character' 'amenity Impacts' 'traffic' 'landscaped Area' 'floor Space Ratio']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Hearing and Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal is an overdevelopment and out of character with the neighbourhood' 'Whether the proposal has adverse amenity impacts including noise, traffic, visual impact, overshadowing' 'Whether the development complies with landscaped area and floor space ratio requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
Notwithstanding minor non-compliance with development standards, the proposal meets the objectives of the planning controls as interpreted and found not to constitute overdevelopment, adversely affect neighbourhood character, or amenity, and the SEPP 1 objection was accepted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application number 02/1693 for the erection of five three-bedroom villa homes with basement car-parking for 13 cars at lots 43 and 42, DP 16718 known as 34-36 Barraran Street, Gymea Bay is determined by granting development consent subject to the conditions in annexure A.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment