Johnson v R [2021] NSWCCA 13
It was an error to treat the mere presence of children as an aggravating factor for Count 1, absent evidence of their awareness. An identical error was properly conceded for Count 2. Since sentence was thereby infected by error, the Court must resentence afresh.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Resentence
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; resentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing Appeals' 'sexual Offences Against Children' 'circumstances of Aggravation' 'error in Sentencing' 'aggregate Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Resentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding the presence of children was an aggravating factor for Counts 1 and 2.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in admitting evidence of uncharged material (Exhibit B).' 'Whether the original sentence was manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
It was an error to treat the mere presence of children as an aggravating factor for Count 1, absent evidence of their awareness. An identical error was properly conceded for Count 2. Since sentence was thereby infected by error, the Court must resentence afresh.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; resentence imposed
Orders
- ['Extension of time to file Notice of Grounds of Appeal to 8 May 2020.' 'Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal upheld.' 'Aggregate sentence by Wilson SC DCJ on 1 October 2019 quashed.' 'Aggregate sentence of 24 years imprisonment commencing 25 August 2017 to 24 August 2041, with a non-parole period of 18 years imposed.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment