Young v Sutherland Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1119

Young v Sutherland Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1119

The appeal is upheld and development consent granted because all statutory preconditions for granting consent are met, with compliance as to planning, environmental and amenity requirements, and the parties reached agreement at conciliation with adequate conditions imposed.

Parties
Applicant: Troy Young; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation, Final Orders
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Legal Topics
Development Application, Consent Conditions, Conciliation Conference

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Troy Young

Applicant

Sutherland Shire Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal / Conciliation, Final Orders

  1. 1 Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent are met
  2. 2 Whether the development application should be granted subject to conditions

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is upheld and development consent granted because all statutory preconditions for granting consent are met, with compliance as to planning, environmental and amenity requirements, and the parties reached agreement at conciliation with adequate conditions imposed.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld.
  • Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA 22/0625 for the alterations and additions to the existing dwelling house at 5 Lugano Avenue, Burraneer NSW 2230 subject to the conditions contained in Annexure A.