Clarke v Sandhurst Trustees Limited [2014] FCA 580
The Court was satisfied that the applicants, having made reasonable inquiries but lacking sufficient information to decide whether to commence proceedings, reasonably believed Sandhurst may have breached statutory and trust duties regarding diligence and investigation in relation to the property and conduct of Wickham. Discovery was ordered as the requirements of r 7.23 were met and production would assist in the applicants' decision whether to proceed.
- Parties
- Prospective Applicants: Graeme Clarke and Marion Clarke; Prospective Respondent: Sandhurst Trustees Limited (ABN 16 004 030 737)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Discovery Prior to Principal Proceedings / Judgment on Application for Preliminary Discovery Under R 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
- Outcome
- Application for preliminary discovery granted; discovery orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee's Duties in Relation to Debenture Holders, Preliminary Discovery, Statutory Construction of Trustee Liability, Fiduciary Duties of Trustees Under Ch 2 L of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Clarke and Marion Clarke
Prospective Applicants
Sandhurst Trustees Limited (ABN 16 004 030 737)
Prospective Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Discovery Prior to Principal Proceedings / Judgment on Application for Preliminary Discovery Under R 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants reasonably believe they may have a right to obtain relief against the trustee under Trust Deed and Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 283DA
- 2 Whether the applicants made reasonable inquiries and lack sufficient information to decide to commence proceedings
- 3 Whether the trustee is likely to have documents directly relevant to the right to obtain relief and if inspection would assist the applicant's decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the applicants, having made reasonable inquiries but lacking sufficient information to decide whether to commence proceedings, reasonably believed Sandhurst may have breached statutory and trust duties regarding diligence and investigation in relation to the property and conduct of Wickham. Discovery was ordered as the requirements of r 7.23 were met and production would assist in the applicants' decision whether to proceed.
Court Disposition
Application for preliminary discovery granted; discovery orders made.
Orders
- Within 21 days, Sandhurst to give discovery to the applicants, as trustees of the G & M Clarke Superannuation Fund, of hard copy documents in approximately 11 lever-arch folders and documents in a specific electronic folder ('Wickham'), limited to documents listed in Schedule 1 and coming into possession between 1...
- Discovery may be by electronic copies or inspection by applicant's solicitor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment