TU v Vaisman (No 2) [2013] NSWADT 97
Dr Balafas is a person whose joinder as a respondent is necessary to determine the underlying question of liability for unlawful discrimination under s 52 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. His alleged involvement underpins the matters in dispute and satisfies the necessary joinder criteria under s 67(4) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Join Respondent
- Outcome
- Application granted: Dr Balafas is joined as a respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'joint Liability' 'practice and Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Join Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Dr Balafas should be joined as a respondent for contributing to the unlawful act of another under s 52 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977' "Interpretation of 'person whose joinder is necessary to the determination of all matters in dispute in the proceedings' under s 67(4) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997"]
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Balafas is a person whose joinder as a respondent is necessary to determine the underlying question of liability for unlawful discrimination under s 52 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. His alleged involvement underpins the matters in dispute and satisfies the necessary joinder criteria under s 67(4) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
Court Disposition
Application granted: Dr Balafas is joined as a respondent.
Orders
- ['Dr Balafas is joined as a respondent to these proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment