Mulvenna v Tuan Golden Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 108
The applicants failed to objectively prove that the new evidence (from ARL and additional Airbnb quotes) was not reasonably available before the first instance hearing, as similar evidence was obtained previously within short timeframes. Therefore, the statutory test for admission of fresh evidence on appeal was not met, and leave to appeal was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Reinstatement and Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application to reinstate appeal granted; application for leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Panel Jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal' 'new Evidence' 'home Building Act Warranties' 'damages for Alternative Accommodation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Reinstatement and Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether new evidence tendered was not reasonably available at first instance and meets the statutory test for fresh evidence on appeal' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted based on alleged new evidence unavailable before the Tribunal']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to objectively prove that the new evidence (from ARL and additional Airbnb quotes) was not reasonably available before the first instance hearing, as similar evidence was obtained previously within short timeframes. Therefore, the statutory test for admission of fresh evidence on appeal was not met, and leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application to reinstate appeal granted; application for leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- ['The application to reinstate the appeal is granted.' 'The application for leave to appeal is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment