TULK V. THE QUEEN
The Court found that the Court of Criminal Appeal had exercised its jurisdiction appropriately and there was no foundation for criticism; consequently, the application should be refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: TULK; Respondent: THE QUEEN
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Leave
- Outcome
- application refused
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
TULK
Applicant
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal failed to exercise its jurisdiction
- 2 Whether criticism of the Court of Criminal Appeal was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Court of Criminal Appeal had exercised its jurisdiction appropriately and there was no foundation for criticism; consequently, the application should be refused.
Court Disposition
application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment