Tunnock v Victoria [1951] HCA 55
The Victorian Soldier Settlement Acts contained an independent State legislative scheme for soldier settlement and authorised compulsory acquisition for the purposes of those Acts. The acquisition of the plaintiffs' land was for soldier settlement pursuant to the Acts, not for the purposes of the invalid War Service Land Settlement Agreement. Magennis was distinguishable, and the invalidity of the agreement did not make the relevant Victorian acquisition provisions or the acquisition inoperative.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Suit/action Seeking Declarations and Consequential Injunctions Concerning Soldier Settlement Legislation and Compulsory Acquisition of Land / Demurrer to the Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Demurrer allowed. Suit dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['validity of State Legislation' 'compulsory Acquisition of Land' 'soldier Settlement' 'war Service Land Settlement Agreement' 'demurrer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Suit/action Seeking Declarations and Consequential Injunctions Concerning Soldier Settlement Legislation and Compulsory Acquisition of Land / Demurrer to the Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Soldier Settlement Acts 1945-1949 Vict. or the Soldier Settlement Act 1945 (No. 5107) were inoperative or of no effect because of the invalidity of the War Service Land Settlement Agreement 1945.' 'Whether the agreement made between the Commonwealth of Australia and the State of Victoria was void and inoperative.' "Whether the compulsory acquisition by the Soldier Settlement Commission on behalf of the State of Victoria of the plaintiffs' land was void or validly effected under the Soldier Settlement Acts." 'Whether P. J. Magennis Pty. Ltd. v. The Commonwealth required the Victorian Soldier Settlement Acts or the acquisition under them to be treated as inoperative.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Victorian Soldier Settlement Acts contained an independent State legislative scheme for soldier settlement and authorised compulsory acquisition for the purposes of those Acts. The acquisition of the plaintiffs' land was for soldier settlement pursuant to the Acts, not for the purposes of the invalid War Service Land Settlement Agreement. Magennis was distinguishable, and the invalidity of the agreement did not make the relevant Victorian acquisition provisions or the acquisition inoperative.
Court Disposition
Demurrer allowed. Suit dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Demurrer allowed.' 'Suit dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment