TURNER V. REIBEL
Although the damages awarded were low, they were not so inadequate as to justify appellate interference, as the trial judge had regard to all relevant matters, including the appellant's pre-existing conditions and future prospects.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Turner; Respondent: Reibel
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1960
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Appeals in Damages Cases
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Turner
Appellant
Reibel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the general damages awarded to the appellant were inadequate
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in the assessment of damages by failing to find permanent incapacity or by not accounting for all injuries
Ratio Decidendi
Although the damages awarded were low, they were not so inadequate as to justify appellate interference, as the trial judge had regard to all relevant matters, including the appellant's pre-existing conditions and future prospects.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment