Lam v R [2014] NSWCCA 50

Lam v R [2014] NSWCCA 50

The sentencing judge was entitled, on the facts, to accord less weight to good character given involvement in substantial drug trafficking. The sentences were not manifestly excessive in light of the seriousness of the offences, financial motive, and drug purity. Parity with the co-offender was properly evaluated and, in the face of a specific concession at sentence, no exceptional circumstances justified revisiting parity.

Parties
Applicant: Tuyet Lam; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Determination of Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentence, Supply Prohibited Drug, Good Character, Parity Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tuyet Lam

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Determination of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether good character should be accorded less weight for drug offences
  2. 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
  3. 3 Whether there was a lack of parity between the applicant and co-offender

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled, on the facts, to accord less weight to good character given involvement in substantial drug trafficking. The sentences were not manifestly excessive in light of the seriousness of the offences, financial motive, and drug purity. Parity with the co-offender was properly evaluated and, in the face of a specific concession at sentence, no exceptional circumstances justified revisiting parity.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed