Rogers v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1549
The appeal is upheld and the development application is approved, including the clause 4.6 request, in accordance with terms agreed by the parties at a conciliation conference and as required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The orders give effect to the agreement and provide for costs and specific conditions as set out in the annexures.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tyler Rogers; Respondent: Inner West Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; clause 4.6 request upheld; costs ordered against applicant
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Subdivision, Demolition, Land Use, Local Environmental Plan, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tyler Rogers
Applicant
Inner West Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development application for demolition, subdivision, and construction should be refused or approved
- 2 Whether the clause 4.6 request for variation of the Floor Space Ratio standard should be upheld
- 3 Agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the development application is approved, including the clause 4.6 request, in accordance with terms agreed by the parties at a conciliation conference and as required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The orders give effect to the agreement and provide for costs and specific conditions as set out in the annexures.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; clause 4.6 request upheld; costs ordered against applicant
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. D/2016/497 and to rely upon specified amended plans and documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment