Edwards v R (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1344
The proposed bail conditions satisfactorily address all bail concerns raised, including risk of witness interference and risk of committing a serious offence. Given applicant's age, lack of criminal history, strong support, and mental health vulnerabilities, there is no unacceptable risk requiring refusal of bail.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tyrell Edwards; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Decision on Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail granted on conditions
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Driving Offences, Mental Health in Custody
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tyrell Edwards
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Decision on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail should be granted to an applicant charged with five counts of driving in a manner dangerous causing death
- 2 Whether the bail concerns under s 17 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) are addressed by proposed bail conditions
- 3 Impact of applicant's mental health and background on bail risk assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed bail conditions satisfactorily address all bail concerns raised, including risk of witness interference and risk of committing a serious offence. Given applicant's age, lack of criminal history, strong support, and mental health vulnerabilities, there is no unacceptable risk requiring refusal of bail.
Court Disposition
Bail granted on conditions
Orders
- Bail granted on conditions including living with parents, daily police reporting, house arrest (with exceptions), abstention from drugs and alcohol, prohibition on applying for passport or entering within 500m of international departure point, parents to forfeit $100,000 if applicant fails to appear, prohibition on...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment