Regina -v- Malone [2000] NSWCCA 156

Regina -v- Malone [2000] NSWCCA 156

The sentencing judge did not err in taking into account the presence of a weapon as it related to the circumstances of the offence and did not breach principles from De Simoni. The sentences imposed were not excessive given the seriousness and number of offences. Guideline judgments should inform but not rigidly dictate the sentence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['armed Robbery' 'sentencing' 'guideline Judgment' 'aggravation of Offence']
['criminal Law'] ['armed Robbery' 'sentencing' 'guideline Judgment' 'aggravation of Offence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by taking into account circumstances not reflected in the charges' 'Whether the sentence imposed was excessive' 'Proper application of guideline judgments for armed robbery under s.97 of the Crimes Act 1900']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in taking into account the presence of a weapon as it related to the circumstances of the offence and did not breach principles from De Simoni. The sentences imposed were not excessive given the seriousness and number of offences. Guideline judgments should inform but not rigidly dictate the sentence.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']