UCP Gen Pharma AG v Mesoblast, Inc (No 2 ) [2012] FCA 500
The applicant was successful in court due to new evidence that post-dated the hearing before the delegate. The delegate was not wrong in his decision on the evidence before him. Therefore, there was no justification for varying the delegate's costs award in favour of the applicant.
- Parties
- Applicant: UCP Gen Pharma AG; Respondent: Mesoblast, Inc
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Costs Following Successful Appeal From Registrar of Trade Marks
- Outcome
- The applicant's application for costs with respect to the proceeding before the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks is dismissed; moneys paid into court for security, together with accrued interest, to be released to the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Trade Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UCP Gen Pharma AG
Applicant
Mesoblast, Inc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Costs Following Successful Appeal From Registrar of Trade Marks
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should have its costs of the proceeding before the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks following successful appeal
- 2 Appropriate exercise of discretion in varying a delegate's costs award under section 197 of the Trade Marks Act 1995
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was successful in court due to new evidence that post-dated the hearing before the delegate. The delegate was not wrong in his decision on the evidence before him. Therefore, there was no justification for varying the delegate's costs award in favour of the applicant.
Court Disposition
The applicant's application for costs with respect to the proceeding before the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks is dismissed; moneys paid into court for security, together with accrued interest, to be released to the applicant.
Orders
- The applicant's application for costs with respect to the proceeding before the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks be dismissed.
- The moneys paid into court by the applicant in compliance with orders made in this proceeding on 1 September 2011, together with any accrued interest, be released to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment