Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284
The sentencing judge erred by applying the Clark principle as a prescriptive constraint on sentencing discretion, which is not supported by statute or binding legal principle; however, notwithstanding such error, upon re-exercise of discretion, no lesser sentence is warranted in law given the seriousness of the offences and having considered all relevant subjective and objective factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence allowed; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'judicial Discretion' 'general Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred by applying the Clark 'principle' and thus impermissibly constrained sentencing discretion in drug supply cases" "Whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account the applicant's loss of the right to practise law as extra-curial punishment" 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or plainly unjust']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by applying the Clark principle as a prescriptive constraint on sentencing discretion, which is not supported by statute or binding legal principle; however, notwithstanding such error, upon re-exercise of discretion, no lesser sentence is warranted in law given the seriousness of the offences and having considered all relevant subjective and objective factors.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence allowed; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence allowed.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment