Ull Pty Ltd v Adwell Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADTAP 15
Leave to appeal out of time is refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and the proposed appeal has very little merit, raising either no error of law or only minor, non-material issues.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal out of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time' 'unconscionable Conduct Under Retail Leases' 'reasonableness of Delay in Filing Appeal' 'financial Consequences of Tribunal Decisions']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to proceed with an appeal filed out of time under section 113 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997' 'Whether the Tribunal erred in law regarding principles of unconscionable conduct under the Retail Leases Act 1994' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to account for statutory requirements in assessing outgoings under the Retail Leases Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal out of time is refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and the proposed appeal has very little merit, raising either no error of law or only minor, non-material issues.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal out of time refused.
Orders
- ["The Appellant's application for leave to appeal out of time is refused." "Any application for costs in these appellate proceedings must be filed and served, with supporting submissions, within 28 days of the date of this decision. The opposing party or parties must file and serve submissions in reply within a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment