Stevens v Keogh [1946] HCA 16

Stevens v Keogh [1946] HCA 16

By majority, the payments by the Police Association in support of Grigg's libel action did not infringe the law of maintenance and were not ultra vires, as the rules permitted expenditure to secure redress for grievances affecting members in their capacity as police officers. Stevens had standing to bring the suit.

Parties
Appellant; Plaintiff: Percival Thomas Stevens; Respondent; Trustee: Alfred John Keogh; Respondent; Trustee: Lewis Henry Griffiths; Respondent; Trustee: Lionel Thomas Smith; Respondent; President: John Vincent Driscoll; Respondent; Treasurer: Stanley Grant Fisher; Respondent; General Secretary: Charles Joseph Cosgrove; Respondent; Association: Police Association of New South Wales
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment in High Court of Australia
Outcome
appeal dismissed by majority; Stevens' claim rejected
Legal Topics
Ultra Vires, Maintenance, Rule Interpretation, Grievance Redress, Fund Expenditure
Association Law Trade Union Law Ultra Vires Maintenance Rule Interpretation Grievance Redress Fund Expenditure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Percival Thomas Stevens

Appellant; Plaintiff

Alfred John Keogh

Respondent; Trustee

Lewis Henry Griffiths

Respondent; Trustee

Lionel Thomas Smith

Respondent; Trustee

John Vincent Driscoll

Respondent; President

Stanley Grant Fisher

Respondent; Treasurer

Charles Joseph Cosgrove

Respondent; General Secretary

Police Association of New South Wales

Respondent; Association

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment in High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the payment of Grigg's litigation costs ultra vires the Police Association of NSW?
  2. 2 Did the action amount to unlawful maintenance?
  3. 3 Did Stevens have sufficient standing to sue for alleged misuse of funds?

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the payments by the Police Association in support of Grigg's libel action did not infringe the law of maintenance and were not ultra vires, as the rules permitted expenditure to secure redress for grievances affecting members in their capacity as police officers. Stevens had standing to bring the suit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed by majority; Stevens' claim rejected

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.