Unilin Beeher BV v Huili Building Materials Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1615
The applicant is entitled to an account of profits from the first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents for infringement of Australian Patent No 713628, to be calculated without discount for general overheads or 'innocent infringement', as respondents failed to properly account for or prove such deductions or ignorance, and have been on notice at least from 23 February 2005. Profits are to be apportioned according to evidence of sales by each respondent; costs and interest are also awarded against them.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment on Quantum (account of Profits) After Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for the applicant against the first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents for account of profits (including interest); costs ordered against first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents. Final quantum orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['patent Infringement' 'account of Profits' 'joinder of Parties' 'indemnity' 'summary Judgment' 'remedies']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment on Quantum (account of Profits) After Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Assessment and apportionment of account of profits from patent infringement among multiple respondents' 'Application of Patent Act s 122 and s 123 to account of profits' 'Entitlement to costs and interest' 'Whether any further relief or set off available due to cross-claims between respondents']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to an account of profits from the first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents for infringement of Australian Patent No 713628, to be calculated without discount for general overheads or 'innocent infringement', as respondents failed to properly account for or prove such deductions or ignorance, and have been on notice at least from 23 February 2005. Profits are to be apportioned according to evidence of sales by each respondent; costs and interest are also awarded against them.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the applicant against the first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents for account of profits (including interest); costs ordered against first, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents. Final quantum orders made.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the applicant against Huili Building Materials Pty Ltd (first respondent) in the sum of $99,447.15 including interest.' 'Judgment for the applicant against Bao Jia Sun t/as Huili Australia Trading and Gong Dao Zhang t/as Huili Australia Trading (second and third respondents) in the sum of $317,270.22...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment