Application by Linehan, Desmond Lawrence under s.144 re Keogh, Terence Charles and Federated Clerks Uniion of Australia [1979] FCA 103
The application was dismissed because s.144 did not apply to Mr. Keogh, who had not entered the Union through an application under that section; in any event he had not complied with the rules because he had not paid contributions since removal from the register. The Court also found that he was not engaged in a clerical capacity in his present employment and therefore was not eligible for membership under the Union's rules, and that the Union had proved he was of general bad character by reason of his union election misconduct and his urging of falsified expenses claims.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.144 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904 for a Declaration as to Entitlement to Remain a Member of an Organization / Hearing and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order for costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['union Membership' 'eligibility for Membership' 'general Bad Character' 'clerical Capacity' 'conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904 S.144' 'costs in Industrial Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.144 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904 for a Declaration as to Entitlement to Remain a Member of an Organization / Hearing and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s.144 applied to a person who joined the Union otherwise than by use of s.144 and whose membership was later removed under the rules.' 'Whether Mr. Keogh was included in a category of persons eligible for membership of the Union as a person engaged in a clerical capacity.' 'Whether Mr. Keogh was of general bad character.' 'Whether costs should be ordered under s.197A.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because s.144 did not apply to Mr. Keogh, who had not entered the Union through an application under that section; in any event he had not complied with the rules because he had not paid contributions since removal from the register. The Court also found that he was not engaged in a clerical capacity in his present employment and therefore was not eligible for membership under the Union's rules, and that the Union had proved he was of general bad character by reason of his union election misconduct and his urging of falsified expenses claims.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order for costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'No order for costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment