United Broadcasting International Pty Ltd (No. 2) v TV Plus Int Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 485
The respondents are entitled to the costs thrown away due to the applicant's amendment of its statement of claim; otherwise, each party should bear its own costs of and incidental to the interlocutory hearing on 15 and 21 December 2006 given the complexities and circumstances described.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Costs Order Following Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Partial costs order in favour of the respondents for costs thrown away; otherwise, parties bear own costs for the relevant interlocutory hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'interlocutory Proceedings' 'amendment of Pleadings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Costs Order Following Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to costs thrown away following amendment of pleadings' 'Party entitlement to costs of interlocutory proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents are entitled to the costs thrown away due to the applicant's amendment of its statement of claim; otherwise, each party should bear its own costs of and incidental to the interlocutory hearing on 15 and 21 December 2006 given the complexities and circumstances described.
Court Disposition
Partial costs order in favour of the respondents for costs thrown away; otherwise, parties bear own costs for the relevant interlocutory hearing.
Orders
- ["The costs of the respondents necessarily incurred and thrown away by the amendments effected by the applicant's amended statement of claim filed on 15 December 2006 be paid by the applicant." 'The costs otherwise of and incidental to the interlocutory hearing on 15 and 21 December 2006 be the costs of the parties...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment