United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2003] NSWSC 269

United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2003] NSWSC 269

Because the proposed appeal was not yet clearly defined and no draft Notice of Appeal was available, the Court granted only a limited stay of execution until 1 April 2003 so that an appeal could be instituted and the Court of Appeal could determine whether any further stay was appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution / After Judgment; Pending Proposed Appeal
Outcome
Stay granted
Legal Topics
['stay of Execution' 'appeal' 'winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground' 'equitable Mortgage']
['practice and Procedure' 'equity'] ['stay of Execution' 'appeal' 'winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground' 'equitable Mortgage']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay of Execution / After Judgment; Pending Proposed Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether execution of the judgment contained in order 1 should be stayed pending the defendants' proposed appeal." 'Whether the uncertainty about the scope of the proposed appeal and absence of a draft Notice of Appeal justified only a limited stay.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the proposed appeal was not yet clearly defined and no draft Notice of Appeal was available, the Court granted only a limited stay of execution until 1 April 2003 so that an appeal could be instituted and the Court of Appeal could determine whether any further stay was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Stay granted

Orders

  • ['Execution of the judgment contained in paragraph 1 of the orders made earlier today be stayed to and including 1 April 2003.']