Universal Property Group Pty Limited V Blacktown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1518
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the amended development application subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No 15 2017 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 15-2017, as amended, approved subject to conditions of consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'staged Urban Development' 'subdivision' 'tree Removal' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No 15 2017 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the amended development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 15-2017, as amended, approved subject to conditions of consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. 15-2017 and to rely upon the amended plans listed at conditions 4.1.1, 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 of consent at Annexure "A". Copies of the approved plans are attached at Annexure "B".' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment