Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1336
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreed decision by upholding the appeal and granting development consent subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No. 16-05229 subject to conditions at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'development Consent' 'subdivision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 had been reached between the parties as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "What orders should be made to give effect to the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreed decision by upholding the appeal and granting development consent subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No. 16-05229 subject to conditions at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans listed in condition 2.1.1 and condition 4.1.3 of Annexure A.' 'No order for costs under s.97B of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is made on account that the plan amendments are minor.' 'Development consent is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment