Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1331
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34, and the proposed decision to grant leave to amend the development application and approve the development subject to conditions was one the Court could have made after being satisfied that the relevant planning controls, infrastructure, contamination, design quality and BASIX preconditions were met and that there was no jurisdictional impediment, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Deemed Refusal of Development Application DA 19 01485 / Conciliation Conference Pursuant to S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'deemed Refusal Appeal' 'conciliation Agreement' 'state Environmental Planning Policy Compliance' 'building Height' 'contamination' 'design Quality' 'basix']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Deemed Refusal of Development Application DA 19 01485 / Conciliation Conference Pursuant to S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' s 34 agreement." 'Whether the proposed decision to grant leave to amend the development application and grant development consent subject to conditions was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' 'Whether statutory preconditions to the grant of development consent were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34, and the proposed decision to grant leave to amend the development application and approve the development subject to conditions was one the Court could have made after being satisfied that the relevant planning controls, infrastructure, contamination, design quality and BASIX preconditions were met and that there was no jurisdictional impediment, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend its development application and to rely upon the plans and documents listed in order 20(1).' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. DA-19-01485, for the construction of a residential flat building containing 71 units and associated drainage and landscaping...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment