Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1735
The Court was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites had been met, including requirements relating to integrated development, applicable environmental planning instruments, minimum lot size, public utility infrastructure, contamination, biodiversity and conservation, transport and infrastructure, and s 4.15(1) matters. Because the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No DA 21 02301 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No DA-21-02301 as amended, subject to conditions; applicant to pay respondent's costs thrown away by the amendment in a sum to be agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites' 'integrated Development' 'bushfire Safety Authority' 'environmental Planning Instruments' 'public Utility Infrastructure' 'contamination' 'vegetation Clearing' 'classified Road Access and Noise' 'costs Thrown Away by Amendment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application No DA 21 02301 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement for the grant of development consent to the amended development application was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions." 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent to the amended development application were satisfied.' 'Whether the amended development application could be approved having regard to relevant environmental planning instruments and statutory requirements.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites had been met, including requirements relating to integrated development, applicable environmental planning instruments, minimum lot size, public utility infrastructure, contamination, biodiversity and conservation, transport and infrastructure, and s 4.15(1) matters. Because the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application No DA-21-02301 as amended, subject to conditions; applicant to pay respondent's costs thrown away by the amendment in a sum to be agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No DA-21-02301, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures, subdivision of land into 18 Torren title lots, comprising 17 Torrens title residential lots and 1 residue lot for primary production, removal of trees, construction of a public road, and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment