Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1420
The development as proposed is permissible due to saving provisions; it is consistent with the objectives of the R2 zone under LEP 2015 as it does not have unacceptable amenity or built form impacts and six dwellings could be constructed on the land in an alternative form under the current controls; thus, consent should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'local Environmental Plans' 'development Control Plans' 'planning Controls' 'savings and Transitional Provisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Compliance with planning controls' 'Application of savings provisions under LEP 2015' 'Consistency with zone objectives under LEP 2015' 'Weight to be given to new local environmental plan' 'Site width requirements' 'Amenity impacts']
Ratio Decidendi
The development as proposed is permissible due to saving provisions; it is consistent with the objectives of the R2 zone under LEP 2015 as it does not have unacceptable amenity or built form impacts and six dwellings could be constructed on the land in an alternative form under the current controls; thus, consent should be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['Development Application DA14 – 1964 for demolition and construction of six dwellings at No 43 Church Street, Riverstone approved subject to conditions of consent in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits, other than exhibits a, B, C, D, E, H and 1, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment