Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1623
The agreed decision granting the modification application subject to conditions was one the Court could make because the modified proposal remained substantially the same development as the original consent: qualitatively it remained two 5-storey residential flat buildings, and quantitatively the increase of 24 apartments arose from a changed unit mix with only marginal changes in site coverage and gross floor area. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Modification Application Deemed Refused / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification application approved subject to the agreed modifications and consolidated modified conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'deemed Refusal Appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'substantially the Same Development']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Modification Application Deemed Refused / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreed decision to grant the modification application subject to conditions was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the development as modified was substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The agreed decision granting the modification application subject to conditions was one the Court could make because the modified proposal remained substantially the same development as the original consent: qualitatively it remained two 5-storey residential flat buildings, and quantitatively the increase of 24 apartments arose from a changed unit mix with only marginal changes in site coverage and gross floor area. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification application approved subject to the agreed modifications and consolidated modified conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend its modification application to rely upon the plans listed in Order 1.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application MOD-18-00586 to modify Development Consent JRPP-15-02480 approved by the Joint Regional Planning Panel on 8 March 2017, is approved in accordance with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment