Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1745
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement without a merit...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA-16-1148 approved subject to conditions in Annexure 'A'; Applicant ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of $4500.
- Legal Topics
- ['conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'development Consent' 'subdivision' 'costs']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement without a merit assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA-16-1148 approved subject to conditions in Annexure 'A'; Applicant ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of $4500.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended material listed in the orders, including specified plans and the Stormwater Management Strategy, South Werrington Urban Village Precinct, Revision 8 dated 30 November 2017.' 'The appeal is upheld.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs in the amount...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment