Universal Publishers Pty Ltd v Australian Executor Trustees Limited [2013] NSWSC 2021
The lease permitted the lessor to call on the bank guarantee only if the lessee was actually in default or breach, not merely if a bona fide claim was made. There was a serious question to be tried as to whether Universal was in breach. Damages would not be an adequate remedy if the guarantee were called on and ultimately Universal succeeded, given financial constraints of the trust. The balance of convenience favoured continuation of the injunction.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Universal Publishers Pty Ltd; Defendant: Australian Executor Trustees Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction continued; orders as per judgment paras [89]-[91]
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Remedies, Injunctions, Interlocutory Injunctions, Leases, Bank Guarantees, Construction of Lease
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Universal Publishers Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Australian Executor Trustees Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain defendant from calling on bank guarantee pending outcome of proceedings
- 2 Whether defendant is entitled to demand bank guarantee for alleged breach of lease by plaintiff
- 3 Whether actual breach of lease is required before lessor can call on bank guarantee
Ratio Decidendi
The lease permitted the lessor to call on the bank guarantee only if the lessee was actually in default or breach, not merely if a bona fide claim was made. There was a serious question to be tried as to whether Universal was in breach. Damages would not be an adequate remedy if the guarantee were called on and ultimately Universal succeeded, given financial constraints of the trust. The balance of convenience favoured continuation of the injunction.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction continued; orders as per judgment paras [89]-[91]
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs of the application for interlocutory injunctive relief.
- Proceedings 2013/363434 transferred to Common Law Division to be heard with 2012/348176, with evidence in one to be evidence in the other.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment