Trkulja v Google LLCCitation:[2018] HCA 25Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane, Nettle, Gordon JJDate:13 Jun 2018Case Number:M88/2017Read more
The court held that the proceeding had no real prospect of success as the respondent did not publish the allegedly defamatory matter and the matter was not capable of conveying defamatory imputations.
- Parties
- Applicant: Unknown Applicant; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Application for Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Summary dismissal granted
- Legal Topics
- Publication, Capacity to Defame, Summary Dismissal, Internet Search Engines, Autocomplete Predictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Unknown Applicant
Applicant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Application for Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent published the allegedly defamatory matter
- 2 Whether the matter was capable of conveying defamatory imputations
- 3 Whether the proceeding had no real prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the proceeding had no real prospect of success as the respondent did not publish the allegedly defamatory matter and the matter was not capable of conveying defamatory imputations.
Court Disposition
Summary dismissal granted
Orders
- The proceeding is summarily dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment