Kendirjian v LeporeCitation:[2017] HCA 13Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:29 Mar 2017Case Number:S170/2016Read more

Kendirjian v LeporeCitation:[2017] HCA 13Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:29 Mar 2017Case Number:S170/2016Read more

Advocates' immunity from suit applies only to conduct that affects the conduct of the case in court or is intimately connected with a judicial determination. Negligent advice regarding settlement offers, when not affecting the conduct of the case in court, is not covered by the immunity.

Parties
Plaintiff: Unknown Plaintiff; Defendant: Unknown Defendant
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Advocates' Immunity, Negligent Legal Advice, Settlement Offers, Stare Decisis

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Unknown Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether advocates' immunity from suit applies to negligent advice regarding settlement offers rejected at trial
  2. 2 Whether the advice affected the conduct of the case in court by bearing upon the court's determination
  3. 3 Whether Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd should be reopened

Ratio Decidendi

Advocates' immunity from suit applies only to conduct that affects the conduct of the case in court or is intimately connected with a judicial determination. Negligent advice regarding settlement offers, when not affecting the conduct of the case in court, is not covered by the immunity.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Advocates' immunity applies only to conduct affecting the conduct of the case in court
  • No reopening of Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd