Fuller v LawrenceCitation:[2024] HCA 45Before:Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson, Beech-Jones JJDate:04 Dec 2024Case Number:B24/2024Read more

Fuller v LawrenceCitation:[2024] HCA 45Before:Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson, Beech-Jones JJDate:04 Dec 2024Case Number:B24/2024Read more

A direction given to a prisoner under a supervision order pursuant to the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) is not a 'decision made under an enactment' for the purposes of judicial review and does not entitle the prisoner to reasons under the Act.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Unknown Prisoner; Respondent: State of Queensland
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Supervision Orders, Prisoner Rights, Administrative Decisions
Administrative Law Criminal Law Judicial Review Supervision Orders Prisoner Rights Administrative Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Prisoner

Applicant

State of Queensland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a direction given to a prisoner under a supervision order is a 'decision made under an enactment' for the purposes of judicial review
  2. 2 Whether the prisoner is entitled to reasons for the direction under the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld)
  3. 3 Whether the Act is the source of the direction's effect on the prisoner's legal obligations

Ratio Decidendi

A direction given to a prisoner under a supervision order pursuant to the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) is not a 'decision made under an enactment' for the purposes of judicial review and does not entitle the prisoner to reasons under the Act.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for judicial review is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.