Parry v Secretary, Department of HealthCitation:[2023] HCA 9Before:Gageler JDate:16 Mar 2023Case Number:S162/2022Read more
The matter was remitted to the Federal Court because it required significant case management and fact finding, making it unsuitable for determination in the original jurisdiction of the High Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Unknown; Respondent: Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Remitter Application / Judgment on Remittal to Federal Court
- Outcome
- Remitted to the Federal Court of Australia
- Legal Topics
- Remitter, Jurisdiction, Case Management, Fact Finding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Unknown
Applicant
Unknown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Remitter Application / Judgment on Remittal to Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the matter arising under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) should be remitted to the Federal Court of Australia
- 2 Whether the matter is suitable to be heard in the original jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was remitted to the Federal Court because it required significant case management and fact finding, making it unsuitable for determination in the original jurisdiction of the High Court.
Court Disposition
Remitted to the Federal Court of Australia
Orders
- Matter remitted to the Federal Court of Australia for hearing and determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment