New South Wales v DCCitation:[2017] HCA 22Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Gordon JJDate:14 Jun 2017Case Number:S35/2017Read more
Given the concessions made by the State regarding duty of care and vicarious liability, it was not appropriate to consider the scope or extent of the duty; special leave to appeal was revoked.
- Parties
- Respondent: State; Applicant: Unnamed Applicant
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal revoked
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Statutory Powers, Vicarious Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
State
Respondent
Unnamed Applicant
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope or extent of duty of care in exercise of statutory powers
- 2 Appropriateness of considering scope of duty in light of concessions
- 3 Vicarious liability of the State for breach of duty of care
Ratio Decidendi
Given the concessions made by the State regarding duty of care and vicarious liability, it was not appropriate to consider the scope or extent of the duty; special leave to appeal was revoked.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal revoked
Orders
- Special leave to appeal revoked
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment