Up In Smoke Assets Pty Ltd v Zervas Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1227

Up In Smoke Assets Pty Ltd v Zervas Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1227

The plaintiff, having succeeded in obtaining judgment, is entitled to its costs of the proceedings up to the date of judgment. The costs of and occasioned by the application for freezing orders are to be reserved, as entitlement is unresolved. There is no basis to deprive the plaintiff of costs, even though the principal proceedings could have been brought in the District Court.

Parties
Plaintiff: Up In Smoke Assets Pty Ltd; Defendant: Zervas Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Costs Judgment / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Outcome
Plaintiff substantially successful; costs orders primarily in plaintiff's favour with reservation as to freezing order costs.
Legal Topics
Costs, Freezing Orders, Jurisdiction, Restitution
Equity Civil Procedure Costs Freezing Orders Jurisdiction Restitution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Up In Smoke Assets Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Zervas Pty Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Judgment / Post Judgment Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs after obtaining judgment on the pleadings
  2. 2 Whether costs associated with the application for freezing orders should be reserved
  3. 3 Whether the proceedings ought to have been commenced in the District Court and whether this affects the costs outcome

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, having succeeded in obtaining judgment, is entitled to its costs of the proceedings up to the date of judgment. The costs of and occasioned by the application for freezing orders are to be reserved, as entitlement is unresolved. There is no basis to deprive the plaintiff of costs, even though the principal proceedings could have been brought in the District Court.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff substantially successful; costs orders primarily in plaintiff's favour with reservation as to freezing order costs.

Orders

  • Reserve the costs of the proceedings of and occasioned by the plaintiff's application for freezing orders.
  • Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings to 3 October 2023.