UPG 254 Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1484

UPG 254 Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1484

Because the parties agreed to the grant of consent to the amended development application subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court was...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Principal Judgment Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions at Annexure A.
Legal Topics
['class 1 Appeal' 'deemed Refusal' 'conciliation Conference' 'subdivision' 'integrated Development' 'bushfire Safety Authority' 'contamination and Remediation' 'state Environmental Planning Policies']
['planning and Environment Law' 'development Consent' 'land Subdivision'] ['class 1 Appeal' 'deemed Refusal' 'conciliation Conference' 'subdivision' 'integrated Development' 'bushfire Safety Authority' 'contamination and Remediation' 'state Environmental Planning Policies']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Principal Judgment Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties

  1. 1 ["Whether the Court could grant development consent to the amended development application in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the amended development application satisfied relevant statutory and planning controls, including owner consent, notification, integrated development requirements, bushfire requirements, contamination requirements, zoning, density, minimum lot size, servicing and Transport for NSW matters.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the parties agreed to the grant of consent to the amended development application subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and grant consent.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions at Annexure A.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA-902/2022 for the subdivision of land into 43 residential lots and 3 residue lots over two-stages with tree removal, road construction and associated site works on land legally described as Lot 367 and Lot 368 in DP2475 and...