Urbis Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 147
The amended plans do not amount to a new application; rather, they are a relevant amendment to the development application as permitted under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, as the character and essential ingredients of the development remain the same. Leave should be granted for reliance on these amended plans subject to costs and procedural directions to address the council's prejudice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal (land and Environment Court of Nsw) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Rely on Amended Plans
- Outcome
- Leave granted for applicant to rely on amended plans, subject to costs and procedural directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['amended Development Applications' 'interpretation of Cl 55 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal (land and Environment Court of Nsw) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Rely on Amended Plans
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether amended plans constitute an amendment to the original development application or amount to a new application under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000' 'Discretion to grant leave to rely on amended plans and appropriate conditions/costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended plans do not amount to a new application; rather, they are a relevant amendment to the development application as permitted under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, as the character and essential ingredients of the development remain the same. Leave should be granted for reliance on these amended plans subject to costs and procedural directions to address the council's prejudice.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for applicant to rely on amended plans, subject to costs and procedural directions.
Orders
- ['Leave granted for applicant to rely upon amended plans.' 'Applicant to file and serve all further supporting material by 19 July 2001.' 'Hearing dates 7, 8, 9 and 10 August 2001 are vacated.' "Applicant to pay respondent's costs thrown away by vacation of hearing dates." "Applicant to pay respondent's costs thrown...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment