BABIC v ESSO AUSTRALIA LTD [1993] NSWCA 16
The appellate court should not interfere with the trial judge's decision where the judgment is based on findings as to the credibility of the plaintiff, especially when the judge is not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the injury happened as alleged or that it resulted from the defendant's breach of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: URJ Babic; Respondent: Esso Australia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Workplace Injury, Credibility on Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
URJ Babic
Appellant
Esso Australia Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's decision to dismiss the claim based on the plaintiff's lack of credibility was erroneous
- 2 Whether the appellate court may interfere with a decision based on credibility where no question of principle is involved
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court should not interfere with the trial judge's decision where the judgment is based on findings as to the credibility of the plaintiff, especially when the judge is not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the injury happened as alleged or that it resulted from the defendant's breach of duty. There is no error warranting appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment