KABALAN v ELIAS BROS PTY LTD [1996] NSWCA 286
The finding of fact made by the referee regarding the conversation was supported by evidence and was not contrary to the weight of the evidence; thus, neither Giles J nor the Court of Appeal had grounds to overturn it. Consequently, the limitation defence stood and the appellant's claim was defeated.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: URJ Kabalan; Respondent: Elias Bros Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Findings of Fact, Limitations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
URJ Kabalan
Appellant
Elias Bros Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should overturn a finding of fact by the Referee adopted by Giles J.
- 2 Whether the limitation defence defeating the appellant's claim was wrongly upheld.
Ratio Decidendi
The finding of fact made by the referee regarding the conversation was supported by evidence and was not contrary to the weight of the evidence; thus, neither Giles J nor the Court of Appeal had grounds to overturn it. Consequently, the limitation defence stood and the appellant's claim was defeated.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment