VARGA v SCIGLIANO [1995] NSWCA 482
The court, by majority, held that the trial judge's comment was provisional and tentative, did not constitute apprehended bias, and that there was no evidence the judge failed to properly consider the appellant's language difficulties. Therefore, there was no basis to set aside the judgment.
- Parties
- Appellant: URJ Varga; Appellant's Instructing Solicitor: Michael E Stevens and Co; Respondent: Scigliano; Respondent's Instructing Solicitor: GM Meadows, Solicitors for GIO
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Apprehended Bias, Impartiality of Judges, Importance of Raising Bias Point During Trial, Assessment of Witness Credit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
URJ Varga
Appellant
Michael E Stevens and Co
Appellant's Instructing Solicitor
Scigliano
Respondent
GM Meadows, Solicitors for GIO
Respondent's Instructing Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's remarks constituted apprehended bias justifying disqualification
- 2 Whether insufficient weight was given to appellant's limited understanding of English in assessing credibility
Ratio Decidendi
The court, by majority, held that the trial judge's comment was provisional and tentative, did not constitute apprehended bias, and that there was no evidence the judge failed to properly consider the appellant's language difficulties. Therefore, there was no basis to set aside the judgment.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment