VERMA v McGREGOR [1989] NSWCA 218

VERMA v McGREGOR [1989] NSWCA 218

Systematic fraudulent conduct by a medical practitioner over an extended period, involving abuse of position and lack of insight into wrongdoing, justifies the ultimate disciplinary sanction of removal from the register in the public interest, notwithstanding favourable character evidence or the relatively small sums involved.

Parties
Appellant: URJ Verma; Respondent: McGregor
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 February 1989
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Tribunals, Removal From Register, Fraud by Medical Practitioner
Medical Law Professional Discipline Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Tribunals Removal From Register Fraud by Medical Practitioner

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

URJ Verma

Appellant

McGregor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the order of the Medical Tribunal removing the appellant's name from the Register of Medical Practitioners was justified in light of all relevant circumstances
  2. 2 Whether conditions or a lesser penalty ought to have been imposed instead of removal

Ratio Decidendi

Systematic fraudulent conduct by a medical practitioner over an extended period, involving abuse of position and lack of insight into wrongdoing, justifies the ultimate disciplinary sanction of removal from the register in the public interest, notwithstanding favourable character evidence or the relatively small sums involved.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant's name removed from the Register