WINTOUR v ALLEN [1990] NSWCA 189
The appellant failed to demonstrate special grounds justifying the admission of further evidence. The evidence did not establish he was prevented from attending due to reasons beyond his control, and the factual conflict with his solicitor's affidavit was resolved against the appellant. The trial judge acted appropriately in refusing the adjournment, and no sufficient reason was shown to allow additional evidence on appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: URJ Wintour; Respondent: Allen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Adduce Further Evidence on Appeal / Application Before the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Adduce Further Evidence, Adjournment, Fresh Evidence on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
URJ Wintour
Appellant
Allen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Adduce Further Evidence on Appeal / Application Before the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to adduce further evidence on appeal
- 2 Whether there are 'special grounds' to justify admitting further evidence
- 3 Whether the refusal of an adjournment by Judge Ward was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate special grounds justifying the admission of further evidence. The evidence did not establish he was prevented from attending due to reasons beyond his control, and the factual conflict with his solicitor's affidavit was resolved against the appellant. The trial judge acted appropriately in refusing the adjournment, and no sufficient reason was shown to allow additional evidence on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The application for leave to adduce further evidence is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment