R v Cupples [2014] NSWDC 42
Given the seriousness of the offences, the need for punishment and deterrence outweighed the possibility of a suspended sentence. The offender is suitable for an intensive corrections order; concurrent sentences of two years' imprisonment are imposed, to be served by way of intensive corrections order.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Jonathan Robert Cupples
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to two years imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive corrections order.
- Legal Topics
- Use of Carriage Service to Transmit Indecent Communication, Use of Carriage Service to Solicit Child Pornographic Material, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Jonathan Robert Cupples
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for use of carriage service to transmit indecent communication
- 2 Whether sentence should be suspended or served by way of intensive corrections order
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the offences, the need for punishment and deterrence outweighed the possibility of a suspended sentence. The offender is suitable for an intensive corrections order; concurrent sentences of two years' imprisonment are imposed, to be served by way of intensive corrections order.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to two years imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive corrections order.
Orders
- Concurrent sentences of imprisonment of two years to be served by way of intensive corrections order, commencing 10 March 2014, subject to mandatory conditions prescribed by cl 175 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment