Larsen v Vile [1999] NSWCA 397
The determination of the costs assessor did not involve a matter of law as required under s 208L and thus the appeal of the client should be allowed, reinstating the assessor's certificate. The Supreme Court retains its ordinary powers to award costs in s 208L appeals.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders of lower court set aside
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Costs' 'appeal Under S 208 L Legal Profession Act 1987' 'powers of Supreme Court Regarding Costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the costs assessor's determination under s 208L involved a decision as to a matter of law" "Whether the Supreme Court's powers to make costs orders in an appeal under s 208L are restricted by the Legal Profession Act 1987"]
Ratio Decidendi
The determination of the costs assessor did not involve a matter of law as required under s 208L and thus the appeal of the client should be allowed, reinstating the assessor's certificate. The Supreme Court retains its ordinary powers to award costs in s 208L appeals.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders of lower court set aside
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against orders of Master Harrison granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Orders of Master Harrison set aside' 'The costs of the client in this court and in the proceedings before Master Harrison are to be borne by the solicitor']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment