Valda Rebecca HERTZBERG v Clio Valda HERTZBERG & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1235
The deceased's provision was inadequate because, despite the plaintiff's substantial assets, she had been his wife for nineteen years, had provided care and companionship including extensive care during his declining health, had moved from the United States to Australia, and faced lack of security and dependence on defendants with whom relations had completely broken down. In a large estate with no evidence of competing needs from the defendants, proper provision required transfer of the Darling Point property and a lump sum sufficient for renovations, replacement of expiring annuity income, outgoings and medical requirements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 7 of the Family Provision Act 1982 for Provision Out of a Deceased Estate / Judgment
- Outcome
- Further provision ordered for the plaintiff out of the deceased's estate in lieu of the provisions made under the will; further submissions directed regarding the deed and costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['adequacy of Testamentary Provision for Widow' 'second Marriage' 'right to Reside in Matrimonial Home' 'lump Sum Provision' 'carer Contributions' 'large Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 7 of the Family Provision Act 1982 for Provision Out of a Deceased Estate / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the provision made for the plaintiff by the deceased inter vivos and by will was inadequate for her proper maintenance and advancement in life at the time of the hearing.' "If provision was inadequate, what provision ought to be made out of the deceased's estate for the plaintiff." 'Whether a right to reside in the Darling Point property and medical and health expense arrangements were sufficient in light of the breakdown in relations between the plaintiff and the defendants.']
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased's provision was inadequate because, despite the plaintiff's substantial assets, she had been his wife for nineteen years, had provided care and companionship including extensive care during his declining health, had moved from the United States to Australia, and faced lack of security and dependence on defendants with whom relations had completely broken down. In a large estate with no evidence of competing needs from the defendants, proper provision required transfer of the Darling Point property and a lump sum sufficient for renovations, replacement of expiring annuity income, outgoings and medical requirements.
Court Disposition
Further provision ordered for the plaintiff out of the deceased's estate in lieu of the provisions made under the will; further submissions directed regarding the deed and costs.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff receive, in lieu of the provisions made under the will of the deceased, the property known as 10/4 Greenoaks Avenue, Darling Point.' 'The plaintiff receive by way of lump sum payment out of the estate the sum of $600,000.00.' 'Further submissions be made in relation to the deed and giving effect to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment