In the matter of Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 62

In the matter of Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 62

Rectification of ASIC registers is appropriate as ASIC's records reflected invalid share transfers and director appointments. Condition precedent for Defendants to receive shares was not met, as they did not evidence proportional capital contributions; thus Defendants are not entitled to specific performance for share transfer.

Parties
Plaintiff: Valentino Kovacic; First Defendant: Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Nicholas Kalantzis; Third Defendant: Constantine Kalantzis; Fourth Defendant: Andrea Kalantzis; Fifth Defendant: Buildcon Constructions Pty Limited; Sixth Defendant: Brokers Property Holdings Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Equity; Corporations List / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Orders for rectification of ASIC register; Defendants' Cross-Claim dismissed; Defendants to pay costs.
Legal Topics
Rectification of ASIC Register, Shareholding and Director Disputes, Specific Performance
Corporations Law Equity Rectification of ASIC Register Shareholding and Director Disputes Specific Performance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Valentino Kovacic

Plaintiff

Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd

First Defendant

Nicholas Kalantzis

Second Defendant

Constantine Kalantzis

Third Defendant

Andrea Kalantzis

Fourth Defendant

Buildcon Constructions Pty Limited

Fifth Defendant

Brokers Property Holdings Pty Limited

Sixth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity; Corporations List / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ASIC registers for Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd should be rectified to reflect true directorship and shareholding
  2. 2 Whether Buildcon and Brokers are entitled to an order for specific performance requiring Plaintiff to transfer shares

Ratio Decidendi

Rectification of ASIC registers is appropriate as ASIC's records reflected invalid share transfers and director appointments. Condition precedent for Defendants to receive shares was not met, as they did not evidence proportional capital contributions; thus Defendants are not entitled to specific performance for share transfer.

Court Disposition

Orders for rectification of ASIC register; Defendants' Cross-Claim dismissed; Defendants to pay costs.

Orders

  • Rectification of records maintained by ASIC regarding Centura Global Holdings Pty Ltd shareholdings and directors.
  • Dismissal of Defendants' Cross-Claim for specific performance.